Poland

Trade union density is low at around 10% of employees and there are a large number of trade union organisations. But the vast majority (around 85%) of union members are in organisations linked to the three main union bodies, NSZZ Solidarność, OPZZ and the somewhat smaller, FZZ. 1

Union density and structure

The latest figures from the national statistics agency GUS, published in 2023, show that there were 1,443,400 trade union members in 2022. 2 GUS also estimates union density (the proportion of employees who are union members) at 14.8%, based on workplaces with at least 10 employees.

This is slightly higher than estimate included in the widely used figures from the OECD, which show density at 13.4% in 2017. 3 One reason for this is likely to be that smaller workplaces (below 10 employees) are not included in the GUS figures, and union membership levels in small workplaces are low, for both organisational and legal reasons (see Legal framework).

Using the GUS figure of 1,443,400 trade union members and adjusting it to exclude 125,100 union members who were retired and another 6,500 who were working under a so-called “civil contract” and therefore not employees, produces a figure of 1,311,800 trade unionists who were employees in 2022. With 13.37 million employees in Poland in the third quarter of 2022, 4 this suggests a union density figure of 9.8%.

This is close to the density figure published by the by the polling organisation CBOS, which regularly asks about union membership. Its latest detailed survey, for 2021, estimated union density at 10.5%. 5

The GUS survey indicates that the vast majority of union members (85.3%) are in three national union umbrella bodies, which are considered to be nationally representative and have specific rights. These are NSZZ Solidarność, OPZZ and FZZ.

The development of each of the three organisations has been different. 6

NSZZ Solidarność grew initially from the strikes in the Gdansk shipyard in 1980 at the time of the communist government. After a period of illegality following the imposition of martial law in December 1981 it re-emerged as a legal organisation in 1989. It played a direct political role in the years that followed, but it is now a trade union rather a political movement.

Figures provided to the European Trade Union Confederation show that NSZZ Solidarność had 543,587 members in 2019, 7 while Eurofound’s 2023 survey of national union confederations list it as having 522,961 members. 8 The 2021 CBOS survey indicated that it was the largest trade union body in Poland, with 4.1% of Polish workers in membership.

OPZZ was founded in 1984 after a period of martial law when all trade unions were banned and has remained in being throughout the political and economic transformation of Poland.

It states on its website that it has 450,500 members (July 2025) 9, although Eurofound’s 2023 survey lists it as having 350,000 members. The CBOS survey in 2023 found that 3.1% of Polish employees stated that they were in unions which belong to OPZZ, making it the second largest confederation in Poland.

FZZ is smaller than the other two confederations and largely consists of unions which were previously independent or have left the two larger confederations. It was formed in 2002, when the rules for an important new tripartite commission (see Joint employer/union body at national level) required that only union confederations with at least 300,000 members would be included. Several previously independent unions, with a membership total above this threshold, grouped together to form FZZ and secure a place in the commission. Eurofound’s 2023 survey lists it as having 300,000 members and the 2021 CBOS survey indicated that 1.7% of Polish employees were members of FZZ unions.

In addition to the three main union bodies, the 2021 CBOS survey also showed that 1.3% of employees were in unions not affiliated to the main union confederations. And the GUS survey of trade union membership estimated that there were 204,600 union members outside the three main bodies. Some are members of the smaller confederations, such as Związkowa Alternatywa, which was founded in 2019, or OZZ IP, which was founded in 2002. However, very many are in local unions, which are not affiliated to national confederations. A union can be legally founded by ten employees (see Legal framework) and the 2023 GUS survey found that there were 2,111 union organisations not affiliated to the three main union bodies – most (1,781) operating at the level of a single company or workplace.

Individual unions

The organisational structures of the three main union groupings are different. While both OPZZ and FZZ are confederations of union federations (see below), NSZZ Solidarność has a unitary structure, with members belonging directly to it.

OPZZ has 88 union federations and individual unions affiliated to it, divided into seven industry-level groupings. The largest grouping, in terms of the number of federations and unions involved covers public services, with 20 affiliated union bodies, but there are also 17 affiliated organisations in energy and mining and 16 each in manufacturing industry and transport. 10 However, by far the largest single union affiliated to OPZZ is the teachers’ union ZNP, which states it has 200,000 members. 11

FZZ has 61 national-level union organisations that belong to it – it started with 17 in 2002 – as well as local organisations that belong to its regional structures. 12 Its largest affiliate is the nurses’ and midwives’ union OZZPIP, which states it has around 80,000 members. 13

Both OPZZ and FZZ are built up from individual company or workplace unions, plus organisations operating across several companies. These company and multi-employer union organisations come together in federations, that affiliate to the confederations, although the larger multi-employer unions may affiliate directly.

The 2023 GUS survey indicates that these local union bodies are numerous but small. In total, there are 2,143 multi-company unions and 7,120 single-company unions affiliated to the three main confederations, and on average the multi-company unions have 188 members and the single company unions have 85.

These figures relate to union bodies affiliated to the three main union bodies. The average figures for non-affiliated local unions are 192 for multi-employer unions and 65 for single company unions.

NSZZ Solidarność is structured differently. It is a unitary organisation with both a regional and industrial structure. There are 14 industry secretariats sections plus separate sections for young workers, women, blind workers and workers with disabilities. Each industry secretariat has several sections. 14 The basic organisational building block at local level is the single employer organisation or the multi-employer organisation, where the group covers more than one employer.

Political position

The differing histories of NSZZ Solidarność, which emerged as the main opposition to the communist government in the 1980s, and OPZZ, which was the official union confederation in the same period, help explain the ongoing differences in their political positions. 15

NSZZ Solidarność is close to the socially conservative PiS party of Jarosław Kaczyński. In February 2025, it signed an agreement with Karol Nawrocki, the PiS supported and ultimately successful candidate in the 2025 presidential elections, promising its backing in return for Nawrocki’s agreeing to its policy demands. 16 It did the same for the Andrzej Duda, the PiS candidate in the presidential elections in 2015 and 2020.

The OPZZ, on the other hand, which supported the left-wing SLD party in the past, has a more limited direct involvement. However, the Left party (Lewica) which is part of the coalition government elected in 2024, has said that OPZZ is an “important partner”. 17

FZZ emphasises its political independence.

These differing political positions mean that relationships between the main union confederations are sometimes tense, particularly between NSZZ Solidarność abd OPZZ. However, this may be more obvious at national than at local or workplace level. 18

Legal framework

Trade unions rights are guaranteed in two separate articles of the Polish constitution. 19 Article 12 states that Poland will “shall ensure freedom for the creation and functioning of trade unions”, as well as other voluntary associations, and Article 59 sets out these rights in greater detail, Including the right to bargain and conclude collective agreements and the right to strike. The constitution also makes clear that in certain circumstances the right to strike may be limited “for the protection of the public interest”.

More detailed regulation of trade unions is set out in the Trade Union Act, which was passed in 1991, although it has subsequently been revised. 20

In broad terms the legislation does not interfere with the internal organisation of trade unions, although they are required to register with details of their name, location and statutes. However, it is for the unions themselves to determine these statutes.

Employees, including the police, boarder guards and prison officers can be union members and in 2018, in a significant change, following a ruling by the constitutional court, individuals working under civil contracts rather than employment contracts gained the right to form and join trade unions.

Unions can only be set up through a resolution of at least 10 individuals with a right to form a union. The employer can require that this membership information is verified with the involvement of the local labour court.

Unions have rights relating both to the whole workforce and to individual employees. In defending and advance collective interests they represent the whole workforce. In individual cases they represent their members, although they can choose to represent non-members if they are asked to do so. 21

There are sanctions in the legislation which can be imposed on anyone who tries to hinder the creation or operation of a trade union or discriminates against trade union members.

The legislation also covers unions’ negotiating rights, time off rights, and protection against dismissal.

Membership trends

Union membership has declined sharply since the early 1990s as a result of industrial restructuring and privatisation and a growth in employment in smaller companies in private services. Based on surveys conducted by CBOS, the proportion of employees in unions has fallen from 28% in 1991, to 20% in 2000, 15% in 2010, 12.9% in 2019 and 10.5% in 2021. 22

The 2021 CBOS figures show that union membership is much higher in public institutions, where 24% of employees are union members, than in private sector and state-owned companies, where the figure is 8%, or in the private sector, other than agriculture, where the figure is 4%. Large workplaces are much more likely to be unionised than small ones (13% where there are 250 or more employees compared with 5% where there are fewer than 50).

Unions are making efforts to increase membership. However, how they are doing this reflects their different structures. NSZZ Solidarność has a section of news on its website, called “union development” where it reports on local successes in increasing membership and organisation. 23 OPZZ, on the other hand, has a section where it sets out how to set up a company union and link it to OPZZ, or just how to link it, if the company union already exists. 24

Both NSZZ Solidarność and OPZZ also pushed hard to gain the right to organise workers employed under so-called “civil law contracts” rather than employment contracts. However, although this changed in January 2019 and these workers can now join union, the GUS figures indicate that only 6,500 have done so, 0.5% of all trade union members. 25

Women

The GUS survey shows that just under half (48%) of union members are women. 26 NSZZ Solidarność regularly responds to the ETUC’s gender audit and the 2019 report indicates that 40.0% of its membership is female. The most recent comparable figure for OPZZ is from 2010, when women made up 48.0% of its membership. There are no figures on FZZ’s female membership. 27

Only a minority of employees in Poland are covered by collective bargaining, which takes place largely at company or workplace level. This means that where there are no unions to take up the issue, pay and conditions are set unilaterally by employers – subject to the national minimum wage, and the minimum conditions set by legislation. There are, however, proposals for significant legal changes. 28

Collective bargaining coverage and structure

Collective bargaining in Poland can take place either at the level of a single company or workplace or at a multi-employer level, as set out in Section 11 of the Labour Code. However, in terms both of numbers covered and impact, it is collective bargaining at individual company level that is more important, although overall the impact of collective bargaining is very limited.

The very limited extent of multi-employer collective bargaining (see below) makes any discussion over the relationship between company-level and multi-employer bargaining largely theoretical but the basic principle that applies is that workers’ terms are set by the agreement which is most beneficial to them. 29

There are no official national figures, but the OECD database estimated collective bargaining coverage in Poland at 13.4% in 2019, one of the lowest percentages in the EU. 30

There are very few agreements at multi-employer level. The Ministry of Family, Labour and Social Policy, with which they must be registered, states on its website that currently there are only 61multi-employer agreements, along with 202 additional protocols (the usual mechanism for renewing agreements) still in force. This is only around a third of the 174 multi-employer agreements which were registered in the past. The others have either been terminated by one of the parties (99 agreements) or are effectively defunct as one of the parties no longer has the authority to sign the agreement (14 agreements). 31 A 2022 study on collective bargaining prepared for the Polish government found that only 13 multi-employer agreements were concluded by employer organisations operating outside the public sector, and that the majority were signed by local authorities and covered non-teaching staff in schools. 32 It also found that, the fact that many agreements were signed without an end date, meant that there had been no movement since 2014.

In an interview quoted by Eurofound, one of the authors of the report concluded that “there are practically no collective bargaining agreements at the multi-employer level”. 33

Collective agreements at the level of individual companies or workplaces are more numerous, but still only cover a limited number of employees. These agreements must currently be registered with the local labour inspectorate, and the national labour inspectorate (PIP) includes the number of agreements registered in that year in its annual report. These figures indicate a low level of activity. In 2024, there were that 29 new collective agreements (covering 6,826 employees) and 979 additional protocols registered, following 46 (covering 16,497 employees) in 2023 and 50 (covering 19,952) in 2022. 34

Figures on the total number of agreements and their coverage are only published intermittently. The most recent information, set out by the head of the PIP in a discussion in November 2024 indicated at that point there were 7,931 valid agreements covering 1.5 million employees. 35 However, he went on to say that the actual figure might be somewhat lower as “as not all employers regularly inform the Inspectorate of the termination of an agreement or organisational changes that affect its continued validity”. With 14.0 million employees in Poland in the third quarter of 2024, 36 having 1.5 million covered by collective agreements indicates a coverage rate of 10.7%.

Even if multi-employer agreements are included, the level of collective bargaining coverage in Poland is far below the 80% threshold set out in the EU’s adequate minimum wage directive ((EU) 2022/2041) below which EU member states should establish an action plan to promote collective bargaining.

To respond to this situation and increase coverage, the Ministry of Family Labour and Social Policy in June 2024 produced draft legislation setting out many changes to the existing rules. 37The initial draft has been amended and the implementation date – initially the second quarter of 2025 – has been pushed back, but the potential changes include:

• requiring all employers with at least 50 employees and at least one union present in the company to conduct collective bargaining once every two years, as a minimum;
• extending the range of issues that can be covered by collective bargaining;
• placing limits on the length of time agreements can last – five years for company-level agreements and 10 years for multi-employer agreements;
• changing the arrangements for registering agreements, moving registration from the labour inspectorate (PIP) to the ministry of labour, as well as making the procedure for registering easier so that written documents are no longer required;
• making it easier for an employer to withdraw from a multi-employer agreement in cases of economic difficulty;
• making it easier to extend multi-employer agreements, with the ministry of labour taking the decision after consultation at the request of an employers’ association or at least two trade union organisations or two employers;
• providing for greater use of mediators in disputes; and
• allowing for collective agreements to be challenged on the basis that they do not comply with employment law.

If these changes were all enacted they would make a substantial difference to collective bargaining in Poland, but it is unclear whether this will be the case and when any changes might take effect.

Extending agreements

The Polish Labour Code provides for the possibility of the government extending these multi-employer agreements to other employers with similar operations where there is “an important social interest” in doing so (Article 241 38). This power has been rarely, if ever, used but the legislative proposals first launched in June 2024 (see Collective bargaining coverage and structure) potentially make this easier.

Allowing local variations

Currently, it is difficult for individual employers covered by a multi-employer agreement to opt-out of it. They can only withdraw from it if the other signatories to the agreement (both unions and other employers) agree to an additional protocol which removes them from the deal.

The legislative proposals first launched in June 2024 (see Collective bargaining coverage and structure) would make this easier allowing companies in difficulties to withdraw on the basis of a written declaration setting out their reasons for doing so.

The greater ability to withdraw from multi-employer agreements would be in addition to the existing possibility for employers to suspend collective agreements and other elements of their contractual obligations towards their employees, such as the remuneration regulations (see Subjects covered in agreements) for up to three years.

Employers in financial difficulties have been legally able to do this since 2002, with the agreement of the trade union organisation in the workplace that initially signed the agreement. The 2024 report from the labour inspectorate states that there were 45 cases where a suspension of this sort was registered – higher than in the two previous years (2022 – 23 and 2023 – 21). 39

Who negotiates?

Agreements at the level of the individual company or workplace are negotiated between the individual employer and the local trade union organisation. The Labour Code states that where there is more than one trade union organisation within the company the union organisations should negotiate jointly (Article 241 40 and 241 41). This frequently occurs in practice, as relations between members of the different union confederations are often better at workplace than at national level.

The agreement should be reached with all the unions in the workplace or at least all the “representative” unions in the workplace – these are defined as having at least 15% of the workforce in membership – or 8% if the union organisation concerned belongs to one of the three nationally representative union bodies, NSZZ Solidarność, OPZZ and FZZ (see Trade unions). If no union represents at least 10% of the workforce, then the agreement should be signed with the largest union in the company.

These rules were changed through amendments to the trade union law 42, which came into effect on 1 January 2019. The changes raised the thresholds for the definition of representative unions from 7% to 8% for nationally representative unions and from 10% to 15% for other unions. Unions were already obliged to provide the employer with their membership numbers, and the 2019 legislation requires unions to provide these more frequently and gives employers, and other unions, the right to ask a court to verify the figures.

There is currently no obligation on the employer to negotiate at company level. However, this may change in companies with at least 50 employers where there is a union, if the legislative proposals first launched in June 2024 are implemented (see Collective bargaining coverage and structure).

Multi-employer agreements are negotiated between an employers’ association and unions, which either have representative status (meaning that belong to one of the three nationally representative union bodies, or represent at least 10% of the employees and have at least 10,000 members in the companies to be covered by the agreement or are the largest union in the companies being covered.

Industrial action

The right of trade unions to organise strike is specifically guaranteed in the Polish constitution (Article 59.3), although the constitution also states that, “for protection of the public interest, statutes may limit or forbid the conduct of strikes by specified categories of employees or in specific fields”. 43

In practice, the procedure to be followed before a strike can be called legally is complex, involving mediation and, potentially, arbitration. The rules are set out in specific legislation on the resolution of collective labour disputes. 44

This legislation states that a dispute exists if the employer does not agree to the demands submitted by the union and requires the employer to begin negotiations to resolve the dispute.

If no agreement is reached and the union maintains its demands, a mediator is appointed. This mediator must be appointed from a list of suitably qualified individuals maintained by the ministry of labour. If the two sides cannot agree who should be appointed, the ministry appoints the mediator. Both sides can be asked to pay for the mediator, although in practice it is the employer that does so, and, during mediation, the union can call a warning strike lasting a maximum of two hours if it feels that the dispute will not be resolved within 14 days of the dispute being notified. In certain circumstances the mediator may ask for additional information from the parties or may ask for the preparation of an expert opinion (paid for by the employer) on some aspect of the dispute. Where this occurs, the mediator may request that the strike is postponed.

If the mediation fails to produce a solution, the union (not the employer) can, before starting a strike, submit the issue to the College of Social Arbitration (Kolegium arbitrażu społecznego) with an independent chair and three members appointed from each side. The decision of this body is binding on both sides.

If the union has decided not to submit the issue to arbitration, it can take strike action. However, the union must give at least five days’ notice and must have the support of a majority of those voting in a strike ballot, providing that at least 50% of the company’s employees participated in the vote. (In a multi-employer dispute at least 50% of the employees in each workplace must participate in the strike vote for a strike to be legal.)

Strikes are not permitted where stopping work “threatens human life and health or the security of the state” and certain categories of employees, such as border guards, prison officers and the police are forbidden from striking. However, to compensate for this, other employees can strike for up to half a day in solidarity with workers who do not have the right to strike.

Only unions have the legal right to organise strikes.

A department within the Ministry of Family Labour and Social Policy monitors social conflicts, including strikes, that are related to the economy and industrial relations, based on information taken from the media. It found that in 2024 there were 118 conflicts of this type, down from 136 in 2023 and 156 in 2022. 45 In 2024, the largest number of conflicts was in agriculture, followed by transport and logistics, manufacturing and health and social care.

Length and time of agreements

The Labour Code (Article 241 46) states that agreements can be concluded for either a fixed or an indefinite period, although fixed-length agreements can be extended or converted into indefinite agreements. The fact that many agreements are for an indefinite period, with no end date, has been seen as leading to “a stagnation of negotiations over the years”. 47The government is therefore proposing to introduce a five-year validity period for company agreements and a 10-year period for multi-employer agreements. In both cases it will be possible to extend the length of agreements by a similar period (see Collective bargaining coverage and structure).

Subjects covered in agreements

The Labour Code (Article 240) does not specify what collective agreements must contain stating only that they should set out the conditions of employment and the mutual obligations of the parties.

In practice, collective agreements typically cover pay and its various components such as bonuses and allowances, although settlements often provide for one-off payments rather than percentage increases. Other issues covered include the organisation of working time, leave, health and safety, retirement and pension benefits, severance pay, premia for overtime, nighttime and holiday working, notice periods and company social benefits.

The legislative proposals first launched in June 2024 (see Collective bargaining coverage and structure) include a more detailed list of topics that collective agreements could contain, including:

• pay;
• working time and standards;
• work-life balance; and
• active aging.

Collective agreements are not the only way that workers terms and conditions are determined. Under the Labour Code, employers can also draw up “work regulations” (Regulamin pracy) which set out in detail how the workplace operates (Article 104). These cover issues like arrangements for paying wages, the organisation of working time, health and safety, limits on the use of young workers, clocking-on and absence procedures and work clothing. They must be in place where an employee has 50 or more employees, or, in workplaces with between 20 and 50 employees, where the union present at the workplace requests this.

The employer should consult with the union, if there is one, when introducing or changing work regulations, but if the union does not agree the employer can introduce or change them unilaterally.

Trends in collective bargaining

The available evidence suggests that the number of employees covered by collective bargaining has fallen in recent years. The annual report from the labour inspectorate for 2014, indicated that at the end of that year there were 8,173 company agreements still current, covering around 1.8 million employees. 48 The figures from 10 years later, which have already been quoted, are that in 2024 there were only 7,931 valid company agreements covering 1.5 million employees, and that this might be an underestimate. 49

Looking at the quality of the agreements, the 2014 labour inspectorate report pointed to a “continuing tendency towards giving up earlier more favourable arrangements” with agreements reverting to the minimum employee rights set out in the Labour Code. It concluded: “The data show a decreasing number of collective agreements, limiting the scope of employee rights and a continuing tendency to terminate existing agreements and replace them with regulations.”

With multi-employer agreements almost non-existent, one of the experts, who produced a report on the subject in 2022 concluded that “we are facing a complete collapse of collective bargaining”.

The draft legislation introduced in June 2024 (see Collective bargaining coverage and structure) is an attempt to change this. However, the final form of the legislation remains unclear, as does its impact.

Minimum wage

Poland has a national minimum wage. The government is required to present its proposal on the minimum wage for the following year to the tripartite body the RDS (see Joint employer/union body at national level) by 15 June. 50 The representatives of the unions and the employers then have an opportunity to express their views and, if possible, agree common position on the amount. If agreement cannot be reached, the national minimum wage is set by government regulation by 15 September.

Joint employer/union body at national level

Poland has a tripartite body, the Social Dialogue Council (Rada Dialogu Społecznego –RDS) which brings together representatives of unions, employers and government. 51 On the union side its members come in equal number (eight each) from NSZZ Solidarność, OPZZ and FZZ.

The RDS was set up in 2015 after the previous tripartite body, the Tripartite Commission (TK), collapsed when the three main union bodies withdrew as a protest against the government’s social policy. The RDS is intended to provide a forum for unions and employers to influence government policy, including by commenting on employment and social legislation, and to allow unions and employers to reach their own independent agreements. In addition, it plays a specific role in setting the minimum wage.

The employers and unions frequently take opposing positions in these discussions, but on 14 July 2025, for the first time ever, unions and employers unanimously agreed a common resolution stating that the proposed 3% increase for public sector workers was too low and should be reviewed. 52

Unions provide the main representation for employees at the workplace. Although legislation implementing the EU directive on information and consultation provides for the creation of works councils, and many were originally set up, they are now rare. A few state-owned companies still have company workers’ councils with theoretically wide powers, but their number has fallen.

The basic structure

Workplace representation in Poland is primarily through the workplace trade union organisations. Under the 1991 Trade Union Act, unions are required to “represent the rights and collective interests of all employees regardless of their trade union membership”. 53 Unions’ right to represent workers was extended by a change in the law on trade unions which came into effect on 1 January 2019. Workplace unions can now recruit and organise not just employees but also workers on other contracts who have worked for the organisation for six months.

In addition to representation through the local union, legislation introduced in 2006 provided for the establishment of works councils (rady pracowników) in companies with more than 50 employees, although this was not necessary where an existing binding agreement providing a comparable level of information and consultation was in force before the law came into effect. 54 This legislation was introduced to implement the EU directive on providing a national framework for information and consultation (2002/14/EC) and the powers of these works councils are limited to receiving information on economic issues and being consulted on employment and work organisation issues – entirely in line with the directive. However, the legislation potentially created a new representative structure in Poland, although the long-term impact has been less than might have been expected (see The extent of workplace organisation).

Other pieces of legislation also refer to the possibility of setting up non-union representative structures. This is the case, for example, of the law on large-scale redundancies passed in 2003. This states that, where there is no union, the right to consultation is given to “representatives of employees appointed in accordance with a procedure adopted by a given employer”. 55There is a similar procedure where employers are seeking to suspend contractual rights other than those in collective agreements. However, here, in contrast to the situation for works councils, the legislation does not lay down any further rules as to how these representatives should be chosen.

In addition, a handful of state-owned enterprises, where the privatisation process has not started, have a company workers’ council “rada pracownicza przedsiębiorstwa”. 56This body, whose legal basis goes back to 1981, was initially intended to provide for worker control of state-owned companies and theoretically it has wide powers. However, privatisation has meant the number of bodies covered by this legislation is now very limited. 57

The extent of workplace organisation

Local unions can be set up with as few as 10 members and a survey by the national statistical office GUS shows that there were 11,330 local union organisations in Poland in 2022 – 8,901 operating in a single company or workplace and 2,429 operating in more than one company. 58

However, the relatively low level of union membership in Poland means that most employees are in workplaces where there is no union presence. The CBOS survey on union membership published in 2021 found that in October 2021 around a third (32%) of employees said there was at least one union where they worked. Around a sixth (17%) of respondents were employed in workplaces with one union and slightly fewer (15%) in workplaces with more than one. However, 52% were employed in workplaces where there was no union and 16% did not know whether there was a union or not. 59The CBOS survey identified a major difference between publicly owned institutions, where 65% of respondents reported the presence of at least one union, and purely private companies (outside agriculture), where only 16% of respondents said that one or more unions were present. In publicly owned and private companies the proportion reporting one or more unions was 25%.

Unions were also much more likely to be found in organisations employing larger numbers of workers: unions were present in 52% of workplaces with 250 or more employees; in 44% of workplaces with between 50 and 249 employees; and in just 12% of workplaces with fewer than 50 employees.

Even fewer employees are in workplaces with works councils.

In the years immediately after the initial legislation was passed, a large number of works councils were set up, and, by the end of 2009, 3,034 had been established. 60 However, many were not renewed after their first four-year term, and one estimate is that there are currently fewer than 400. 61The establishment or renewal of a works council must be registered with the ministry of labour, and the number registered each year since 2019 are set out in the table below. As the term of office is four years, only those registered within the last four years are likely to be in existence.

Source: Information provided by Ministerstwo Rodziny, Pracy i Polityki Społecznej and www.gov.pl/web/dialog/rady-pracownikow2

With perhaps 400 works councils and around 19,300 companies with 50 or more employees in Poland, the threshold for setting up a works council, this means that there are works councils in around one in 50 (2.1%) of those companies that could have them. 62 There are no figures on the number of employees covered by works councils.

There are also no published figures on the number of state-owned companies with company workers’ councils, or the number of employees covered.

The overall extent of employee representation at the workplace is indicated by the results of Eurofound’s 2019 European Company Survey. These show that in 2019 15% of establishments in Poland with at least 10 employees had some form of official employee representation, either through the union, a works council or a similar body in the public sector. 63 This was well below the EU27 average of 28%. As elsewhere in Europe, larger organisations were much more likely to have such a structure than smaller ones. The survey shows that 60% of Polish establishments with more than 250 employees had representation, and 39% of those with between 50 and 249 employees. In smaller workplaces, those with between 10 and 49 employees, just 10% had employee representation.

The role of unions

Unions play a crucial role in employee representation at the workplace in Poland, and where they are not present, there will generally be no representation at all.

In the few companies with works councils, the role of unions has changed. When works councils were first introduced, unions chose the members, but this ended following a decision by the Constitutional Court in 2008, and members are now elected by the whole workforce, with unions not even having nominating rights (see Election and term of office). Despite this a survey of 242 works councils in 2015 indicated that unions still played a role, with 80% operating in a unionised organisations and almost all of these having trade union members. Overall, 55% of those responding to the survey were union members. 64

Unions do not have a formal role in the few company workers’ councils in state owned enterprises that continue to exist. Members of the governing bodies of local unions are also forbidden from being members of the presidium of the workers’ council.

Numbers and structure

It is up to the union to decide most of the details of its workplace organisation and structure, which are determined by its statutes. However, the legislation on trade unions does state that when a workplace union is set up for the first time – and this can be done with just 10 members, it should set up a founding committee of three to seven people.

The same legislation also cover the number of union representatives who are released from normal duties (see Time off and other resources) and the number of union representatives who enjoy protection against dismissal, based on the number of union members (see Protection against dismissal).

The right to set up a works council depends on the number of workers employed. Works councils can be established in all companies and organisations with economic activities with 50 employees or more, other than state-owned companies with workers councils (see below). Different workplaces can be counted together, provided they belong to a single employer. The calculation is based on those working with an employment contract and therefore excludes those working on civil contracts, who may be doing very similar work. It is a headcount figure – full-time and part-time employees count the same – based on an average over the previous six months, unless the organisation has not existed for that long. Agency workers are not included in the calculation, other than in the agencies where they work.

However, crucially, a works council can only be set up at the written request of at least 10% of the workforce. The difficulty in collecting this number of written signatures every four years, potentially against the hostility of the employer, is seen as one reason why the number of works councils has declined. 65

The size of the works council depends on the number of employees, as set out in the Table below. All works council members are employees.

Number of works council members relative to employees

Works councils are obliged to register with the ministry of labour when they are first established and when or if they are renewed after their four-year period of office. The latest figures from the ministry of labour, show that of the 95 registrations in 2024 (49 renewals and 46 new creations), two-thirds (62) were in companies with between 50 and 250 employees, a fifth (18) were in companies with between 251 and 500 employees, and an eighth (12) were in companies with more than 500 employees. 66 In three cases it was not possible to establish the size of the company involved.

Company workers’ councils in state owned enterprises have 15 members, although the company’s own statutes may set a different total.

The operation of workplace representative bodies

The operation of the union at the workplace depends on the union’s own statutes. The trade union legislation states that “the rules on … the exercise of trade union functions are established by the statutes and resolutions of the statutory bodies of the trade union”.

However, the trade union legislation also provides that where there are several unions in a company, they can appoint a joint trade union representative for collective issues, and that, where agreement with the employer is needed, the unions should present a joint position, although the legislation does not state how this is to be reached.

There are also few details in the legislation on the operation of works councils. The law states that a works council should meet for the first time within 30 days of its election but otherwise does not state how often it should meet. The legislation requires that the works council must elect a chair from among its members and draw up its own rules of procedure but again does not go into details.

In practice, the 2015 survey of works councils, referred to above, found that fewer than a third of works councils met as often as once a month, while some only met twice a year. They typically reached an agreement with the employer on how they would be informed and consulted. 67

Company workers’ councils in state owned enterprises should set up a committee (presidium) consisting of chair, one or more deputy chairs and a secretary, it can also appoint other committees. The company workers’ council should meet at least once every three months.

Election and term of office

The election and term of office of local trade union representatives is not fixed in the legislation and is up to the union to determine. Within NSZZ Solidarność, the term of office for all offices is five years, and the same is true in the teachers’ union ZNP, the largest union in OPZZ. 68

In relation to works councils, an election to choose its members must be called by the employer, once 10% of the workforce have requested this in writing.

All adult employees, including senior management staff, can vote in the election. However, to stand as a candidate, an employee must have worked for the employer for at least a year, unless the organisation has not existed for that long. Senior management staff, such as the chief accountant and main legal adviser are also prevented from standing. In companies with between 50 and 100 employees, 10 employees must propose the candidates, and in companies with more than 100, the threshold is 20 employees. Unions have no specific nominating rights. The cost of the election is borne by the employer.

The term of office is four years. However, members can be removed from their position on the works council if at least 50% of the workforce with at least six months’ service request this.

Members of company workers’ councils in state owned enterprises are elected by the whole workforce and every employee has a right to nominate. Only those who have been employed for at least two years can stand as candidates, and senior managers are excluding from standing. Members’ term of office is two years, and individuals cannot serve for more than two terms.

Tasks and rights

Company unions have a range of rights relating to

• the protection of individual employees’ rights, particularly in relation to dismissals;
• negotiating collective agreements and agreeing works regulations on pay and bonuses (see below and Collective bargaining);
• ensuring compliance with labour legislation, particularly health and safety regulations;
• managing the activity of the employee with particular responsibilities for health and safety, who is known as a social labour inspector (see Health and safety representation ; and
• dealing with the living conditions of those who have retired.

In relation to individual rights, unions represent their members, although non-members can also request that a workplace union represent them. 69

Workplace unions have specific rights in relation to of factory rules covering:

• regulations on pay;
• regulations on awards and bonuses;
• benefits from the company’s social fund;
• leave arrangements;
• the period over which working time can be averaged;
• night working; and
• drivers’ hours.

In these cases, unions representing at least 5% of the workforce should present a joint position which the employer should take into account, although, if there is no joint position, the employers should consider the separate positions of the unions. 70

The legislation also provides for multi-employer trade unions operating across several companies, which have the same rights as company unions.

The union’s information rights cover the transfer of the business and actions likely to lead to changes in employment conditions and information relating to working conditions and the rules on pay. For bargaining purposes unions also have rights to information on the economic situation of the business (in particular the information provided to the Central Statistical Office - GUS).

Where there is a danger to health the workplace union organisation can inform the labour inspectorate and ask the employer to act. The employer should respond to the request within 14 days.

Workplace unions, or some other representative body (see above), should be consulted in the case of large-scale redundancies and ideally the employer should reach agreement with them. However, if agreement cannot be reached, the employer should take account “where possible” of the unions’ proposals.

The works council’s rights are less extensive. They do not go beyond the provisions of the EU framework directive on information and consultation (2002/14/EC).

The works council has a right to information on “recent and probable development of the employer’s activities and economic situation” and information and consultation on “the situation, structure and probable development of employment”, as well as measures planned to maintain staffing levels, together with “measures likely to lead to substantial changes in work organisation”.

Information should be provided in a way and at a time which allows the works council to analyse the information and prepare for consultation. Consultation should take place in “good faith” and with the aim of reaching agreement between the employer and the works council.

In practice, the 2015 survey of Polish works councils found that information was most frequently provided on the current financial situation of the company (in 85% of cases) and less frequently on expected changes in work organisation, company development strategies and expected changes in employment (all 69%). 71 Only in half the cases (50%) was the works council informed about expected changes in wages. Consultation happened less frequently. In just over half the cases was the works council consulted on changes in work organisation (55%) and expected changes in employment (52%), and even less frequently on rules on remuneration, changes in the company’s structure and company development strategies (all 38%).

These figures may overstate the situation, as it is likely that only the more active works councils responded to the survey.

Company workers’ councils in state owned enterprises have very wide-ranging powers, at least on paper. These include choosing the manager and the right to object to decisions taken by management – conflicts are solved first through conciliation and then by the labour court. In addition, an assembly of all employees must agree a range of issues, including rules on the operation of the business.

However, privatisation and industrial restructuring has greatly reduced the number of companies in this situation and many of those which remain are in severe economic difficulties, substantially reducing the freedom of action for the company workers’ councils. 72

Protection against dismissal

Union representatives at the workplace are protected through Article 32 of the Trade Union Act. 73

This states that a set number of members of the workplace union’s management body or other union member with representative duties may not be dismissed or have their working conditions worsened without the agreement of the local union’s management body. Initially, this protection (and the right to belong to a union) only covered employees, but, since 2019, protection has been extended to anyone providing paid labour for the employer. (This brings in a range of nominally self-employed workers, who make up a significant part of the Polish workforce.)

The workplace union’s management body has 14 working days to respond to the employer's announcement of the planned dismissal of one of its members (seven days if the action involves a worsening of condition but not dismissal). A failure to respond within this time limit is seen as agreement to the employer’s action.

If the employer dismisses a protected member of the workplace union’s management body without that body’s agreement, the issue can be taken to court who may either order reinstatement or payment of compensation. The legislation set the minimum compensation at six months’ average pay.

The protection against dismissal unless the local union organisation agrees is not absolute. It does not apply in the case of bankruptcy or company liquidation, and the legislation states that it can be set aside where this is permitted by separate regulations.

Article 8 of the Labour Code states that rights may not be used in a way that would be “contrary to the socio-economic purpose of this law [the Labour Code] or the principles of social coexistence”. 74 This provision has been used by the courts to remove protection from members of the workplace union’s management body when they consider that their continuing protection against dismissal would be damaging to the principles of social coexistence. Examples include exceptionally bad behaviour by the union representative, a gross breach of employee duties and where a union has only been created to protect against dismissal. However, it is important to note that this only happens in exceptional cases. 75

Not all members of the management board of the local union organisation are protected against dismissal, with the number varying in line with the number of union members in the organisation and whether or not the local union organisation is part of one of the three union bodies participating in national level social dialogue; (There are currently three, NSZZ Solidarność, OPZZ and FZZ – see Trade unions.)

Protection for more than one representative is only extended to “representative” unions in the workplace. These are defined in Article 25,3.1 and 25,3.2 of the Trade Union Act as:

• unions which have at least 8% of the workforce in membership, if the local organisation is part of or affiliated to one the union bodies participating in national level social dialogue;
• workplace unions with at least 15% of the workforce in membership if the local union does not belong to one of the three main confederations; and
• the largest union in the workplace if no union in the workplace meets these membership thresholds.

The local union decides the number of the members of the management board who are to be protected, making a choice between two methods to fix the maximum number.

This is either the same number as there are members of management, or a number based on the number of union members at the workplace. Where the number protected is based on the number of union members, the union has the right to have two individuals protected if it has up to 20 members in the workplace. If it has more than 20 members, it has the right to two plus additional members as set out in the Table.

Number of protected union members relative to union membership

For example, if there were 250 union members at the workplace, the union would have the right to have 11 members of its management body protected (two plus nine).

Other unions in the workplace – those which are not representative – are entitled to a single protected representative.

The union must provide the employer with the names of the individuals it wants to be protected as well as the length of time the protection should last (Article 32,9.2).

Where a workplace trade union body has been set up for the first time, protection against dismissal is provided for up to three members of the founding committee for a period of six months from its establishment.

Protection continues for period after leaving office equivalent to half the length of the period of office but with an overall maximum of 12 months.

Protection for works council members is included in separate legislation covering information and consultation. 76 This states in Article 17 that a member of the works council may not be dismissed or have their working conditions worsened without the agreement of the works council during their period of office.

However, in contrast to members of the workplace trade union management body, who enjoy up to 12 months protection after leaving office, this protection does not continue after works council members have left office. Protection for national works council members is also worse than the protection provided for Polish members of European works council, who under Article 37,1 of the European Works Councils Act continue to be protected against dismissal for 12 months after leaving office. 77

Time off and other resources

All employees have a right to be released from normal duties to fulfil their trade union functions, although it is not required that this be paid except where it is a temporary activity which cannot be undertaken outside work time.

In addition, under Article 31 of the Trade union Act, members of the executive committee of a “representative union” at company or workplace level have time off rights as set out in the Table below, during their period of office. The trade union can request that this leave is paid.

As with protection against dismissal, a representative union at this level is either a union organisation belonging to one of the three nationally representative unions (NSZZ Solidarność, OPZZ and FZZ – see Trade unions) with at least 8% of the workforce in membership, or a union organisation outside the three main unions with at least 15% of the workforce in membership, or the largest union in the workplace or company.

The number of individuals entitled to time off and the amount of time off provided both depend on the number of members and the number of individuals is subject to the limit that the total entitled to time off cannot exceed the number of management staff. The details are as follows:

Number of protected union members relative to union membership

The changes to trade union law, which came into effect in January 2019, allow for collective agreements on time off for trade union duties. However, the practical implications of this remain unclear.

The workplace union organisation is also entitled under legislation to “the necessary premises and technical facilities required for carrying out its activities”, although the employer may request payment for this.

Works council members have the right to paid time off to carry out their duties if these cannot be undertaken outside working time and the individual concerned is not already benefiting from other time-off rights (Article 17 of the legislation on workers’ information and consultation).

Works councils also have the right to be assisted by a specialist (Article 15), although the legislation does not specify who should pay.

Training rights

There are no specific training rights for workplace employee representatives. This is the case both for members of the executive committee of the local union organisation and for members of the works council.

Representation at group level

The law allows for unions to be set up which cover several employers, and the executive members of these organisations have protection against dismissal and rights to paid time off on a comparable basis to that provided to local union organisations in a single workplace or company.

However, there is no works council structure above that of a single company.

There is no right to board-level employee representation in privately owned companies in Poland. Polish legislation provides for employee representatives at supervisory board level in companies in the process of being privatised, but some important companies which are partially owned by the state no longer have employees on the supervisory board .78

The extent of board-level employee representation

Polish legislation does not provide for a right to board-level employee representation in private companies. However, in 1996, new legislation (Law on commercialisation and certain employee rights) gave employees the right to representation on the supervisory boards of companies that were being privatised, as well as on the management boards of larger companies. 79 (The Polish system provides for supervisory boards in public limited companies to oversee the management board, which runs the company on a day-to-day basis.)

In enterprises which are entirely state-owned, and where the privatisation process has not started, the amended 1981 legislation on workers’ self-management still applies. This provides for 15-member “workers’ councils”, elected by all employees (see Workplace representation).

The legislation on companies in the process of transformation into private companies provides for different arrangements, depending on whether the state is the sole shareholder or the shares are held by other bodies or individuals.

Where the state is the sole shareholder, the legislation states in Article 12, that representatives of employees should make up two-fifth of the members of the supervisory board (or one fifth in companies linked to agriculture or fisheries, with the other fifth representing agricultural or fishery workers).

In cases where the state still holds some shares but is no longer the sole shareholder, employees are, under Article 14 of the legislation, entitled to around one third of the seats – two seats on a board of six, three where the board has seven to 10 members, and four where the board has 11 or more members. In companies linked to agriculture and fisheries, one of these seats goes to representatives of these workers in supervisory boards with 10 or fewer members, and two in supervisory boards with 11 or more members.

In addition, under Article 16 of the legislation, employees are also entitled to elect a member of the management board if the company has more than 500 employees.

Companies which are wholly or partially state-owned play an important part in the Polish economy, employing 510,500 people at the end of 2021 according to figures produced by the ministry responsible. 80

However, not all of them have employee representatives on their supervisory or management boards. One of the largest, the energy group Orlen, which is 49.9% owned by the state and had 66,554 employees at the end of 2023, 81 has no employee representatives on its 10-member supervisory board. The same is true for the eight-person supervisory board at the energy group PGE, which is 60.9% owned by the state and had 43,644 employees at the end of 2023. 82

There is also pressure to reduce the role of employee representatives. For example, the railway freight operator PKP Cargo changed its company statutes in 2024 to reduce the number of employee representatives on its supervisory board from three to one and removed the employee representative from the management board. 83

However, there are important companies that have employee representatives on their supervisory board, 84 including the chemical group Grupa Azoty, which is 33.0% owned by the state and has three employee representatives on its eight-strong supervisory board, and the Polish Post Office, Poczta Polska, where two of the eight supervisory board members are elected by the employees. 85

Nomination and election of employee representatives

Under the 1996 legislation, the employee representatives on the supervisory board are elected by a secret ballot of all employees. The rules and procedure by which employees choose the employee representative on the management board are determined by the statutes of the company.

The rights of employee representatives

The employee representatives have the same rights as other board members.

Employee members of the supervisory board are also protected against dismissal or other forms of disadvantage during their period of office and for a year after their period of office has ended.

The term of office of a member of the supervisory board in a joint-stock company cannot be longer than five years. 86

In most cases the union or unions choose the Polish representatives for the bodies linked to European Works Councils or European Companies. The exception is board members, who are to be elected by all employees.

European Works Councils

Polish members of the special negotiating body (SNB) for an EWC are appointed by the representative union in the company. (A representative union for this purpose is defined as having at least 15% of the employees as members, or 8% if the local union organisation belonged to one of the three nationally representative unions, Solidarność, OPZZ and FZZ – see Trade unions.) If there is no representative union the members are elected by the workforce in a secret ballot. If there are several representative unions and they cannot agree, the members are elected by the workforce from candidates nominated by the unions. The legislation does not specify whether non-employees may be chosen. 87

The procedure is the same for Polish members of an EWC appointed under the fallback procedure in the annex to the directive. 88

European Company

Polish members of the special negotiating body (SNB) for a European Company are appointed by the representative union in the company. (A representative union for this purpose is defined as having at least 15% of the employees as members, or 8% if the local union organisation belonged to one of the three nationally representative unions, Solidarność, OPZZ and FZZ.) If there is no representative union the members are elected by the workforce in a secret ballot. If there are several representative unions and they cannot agree, the members are elected by the workforce from candidates nominated by the unions. The legislation specifically states that trade union representatives who are not employees may be included in the SNB, although it also states that employees must make up a majority of the SNB. 89

The procedure is the same for Polish members of an SE representative body appointed under the fallback procedure in the annex to the directive, although here they must be employees.

Employee representatives from Poland taking seats on the board under the fall-back procedure in the annex to the directive must, in contrast, be elected by secret ballot at a meeting of all employees.

There must be a joint health and safety committee in workplaces with more than 250 employees, and employees have a right to elect social labour inspectors with important health and safety powers, but only if there is a union at the workplace.

Employee health and safety bodies

Employers with more than 250 employees are required to set up a joint health and safety committee (komisja bezpieczeństwa i higieny pracy – komisja bhp) to provide advice and views on health and safety issues.

In addition, where there is a union organisation at the workplace, employees have the right to elect an employee with particular responsibilities for health and safety, who is known as a social labour inspector (społeczny inspektor pracy – sip). Where there are no unions present this position does not exist.

Numbers and structure

Legislation does not specify the number of members of the health and safety committee. However, it should contain an equal number of representatives of the employer and the employees. The employer’s representatives should include those in the employer’s occupational health service and, where there is one, the doctor providing preventative health services to the employees. The employees’ representatives should include the social labour inspector (sip). Guidance from the National Labour Inspectorate suggests that an effectively functioning health and safety committee should contain 10 to 15 people. 90

There can be social labour inspectors at the level of the whole company (company social inspectors), at departmental level and within smaller organisational units. There are no set employment thresholds, although the number of employees does affect how they are elected (see Election and term of office).

Research by the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work in 2019 found that 26% of workplaces in Poland had health and safety representatives. This is less than half the EU-28 average of 56%. This may be partially explained by Poland’s low levels of union density (see Union density and structure) as a social labour inspector can only be chosen if there is a union at the workplace. In terms of health and safety committees, Poland scores much better. A fifth (20%) of Polish workplaces have a health and safety committee, just below the EU27 average of 22%. (The figures are for workplaces with five or more employees.) 91

Tasks and rights

In addition to the general obligation on employers to consult employees or their representatives about health and safety, there is a particular requirement to consult them on a number of issues. These are:

• changes in work organisation;
• the introduction of new technological processes and chemical substances, which could be dangerous to health;
• the evaluation of risks;
• the setting up of the occupational health service or its provision by external bodies;
• first aid arrangements, fire precautions, and evacuation procedures;
• the provision of protective equipment, including clothes and shoes; and
• health and safety training for employees.

Employees or their representatives have the right to present proposals to the employer to eliminate or limit workplace hazards. Based on a justified proposal from employees or their representatives related to threats to health and safety, the state labour inspectorate can inspect and impose the appropriate penalties.

Where there is a health and safety committee the rights described above can be transferred to the employee members of this committee. In addition, tasks of the health and safety committee include inspecting working conditions, periodically assessing the state of health and safety, expressing a view on the measures taken by the employer to avoid accidents at work and occupational diseases, formulating proposals to improve working conditions and cooperating with the employer in the carrying out of his or her duties in the area of health and safety.

The tasks and rights of social labour inspectors are more precisely defined and potentially more extensive. They have a right to:

• monitor the state of the buildings, machinery, technical equipment and sanitary facilities from a health and safety perspective;
• monitor compliance with labour laws and collective agreements, in particular in the area of health and safety;
• participate in the monitoring of the compliance in the workplace with laws on the protection of the natural environment;
• participate in determining the causes of accidents at work;
• participate in the analysis of the causes of accidents and occupational diseases and their control through the appropriate preventative measures;
• participate in surveys of working conditions;
• express a view on plans to improve health and safety conditions and monitor the carrying out of those plans; and
• arrange for the active participation of the workforce in creating the appropriate conditions for health and safety.

In carrying out these duties, social labour inspectors have the right to enter the premises at any time and to be given documents relating to the issues they deal with. They should inform the employer where health and safety requirements are not being met, and they can ask for employees who do not have the appropriate training to work in a safe manner to be withdrawn from that work. They also have powers to recommend to the employers that specific hazards be removed, and, in the case of a direct threat to workers’ safety and where the employer fails to act, they can require that a particular process or piece of equipment be halted. The ability to request employer to halt a particular process or stop machinery is limited to the company social labour inspector (the most senior), who must communicate the decision to the local trade union organisation. The employer can appeal against the decision to the National Labour Inspectorate.

Social labour inspectors, provided the workplace union organisation agrees, can call on the National Labour Inspectorate to carry out an inspection of the employer and they have the right to participate in that inspection.

Frequency of meetings

Where there is a health and safety committee it should meet at least once every three months.

Election and term of office

Employee representatives on health and safety issues, including those on the health and safety committee, where this exists, are elected by the local union body. Where there is no local union organisation, they are elected by all employees according to workplace procedures.

The rules for the election of social labour inspectors are more detailed. They can be either union members or, if the union chooses this, non-union members, but they may not have a managerial position, and they should be experienced – normally at least five years in the industry and two years in the company for the company social labour inspector. In companies or departments with up to 300 employees, both the company social labour inspector and the departmental social labour inspectors are elected by the whole workforce. In large companies and departments, they are elected by the lower-level social labour inspectors. In smaller organisational units they are elected directly by the workforce in that unit.

The rules for the elections of social labour inspectors in companies or departments with more than 300 employees are set by the workplace union organisation, although national unions can determine generally applicable rules.

The term of office is four years.

Resources, time off and training

Consultation with employee representatives on health and safety issues should take place in “appropriate conditions” and during working time; the employee represntatives should be paid. The meetings of the health and safety committee should also take place during working time and employee representatives should be paid.

The health and safety committee has the right to make use of an external expert in carrying out its duties, provided this has been agreed with the employer. The cost of the expert is borne by the employer.

The costs of the activity of the social labour inspectors are borne by the employer but in principle their work should take place outside working hours. However, where the activity does take place during working time, they should be paid. In addition, where the duties of social labour inspectors are particularly onerous, they can be for paid for 30 or in some cases 60 hours. In addition, in very rare cases where there is a constant and ongoing threat to workers’ health and safety, for example in a steel works, they can be on permanent paid release.

Protection against dismissal

Employee representatives on health and safety issues, including employee members of the health and safety committee, should not be disadvantaged as a result of their health and safety activities.

Social labour inspectors may not be dismissed during their period of office or in the following year without the agreement of the workplace union organisation.

Other elements of workplace health and safety

An employer with more than 100 employees must create an occupational health service (służbą bhp), which has an advisory and monitoring tasks. Small employers, with up to 10 employees, or 50 if the health and safety risks are low, can carry these tasks out themselves, provided they have the appropriate training. (In a change to the regulations, the employment threshold for low-risk workplaces was increased from 20 to 50 from 1 January 2019.) Employers with fewer than 100 employees can entrust these tasks to an employee, who also has other responsibilities. Those with between 100 and 600 employees must set up an occupational health service with at least one post, although this can be part-time. Those with more than 600 employees must have an occupational health service with at least one full-time post, with an extra full-time post for each additional 600 employees. If an employer does not have any employees with appropriate qualifications to undertake this role, he or she can contract an external body to provide this service.

National context

The ministry responsible for health and safety at work is the Ministry of Family, Labour and Social Policy (Ministerstwo Rodziny, Pracy i Polityki Społecznej). The National Labour Inspectorate (Państwowa Inspekcja Pracy – PIP) is the body responsible for ensuring compliance with Poland’s health and safety and general labour laws.

Trade unions and employers are able to influence health and safety policy through their membership of the tripartite Social Dialogue Council (Rada Dialogu Społecznego – RDS), although this is the principal forum for social dialogue, and it deals with a wide range of issues, as well as health and safety (see Joint employer/union body at national level).

The Polish Labour Code, the key piece of legislation on health and safety, does not specifically refer to psychosocial risks. However, following an amendment in 2003 it does contain a requirement for an employer to act against bullying at work (Article 94.3). 92

Key legislation

Labour Code: Section X Work safety and hygiene

Law on Social Labour Inspection 24 June 1983

Kodeks pracy: Dział dziesiaty Bezpieczeństwo i higiena pracy

Ustawa z dnia 24 czerwca 1983 r. o społecznej inspekcji pracy

• 1

  For a detailed examination of trade unions in Poland see Poland: Trade unions developing after a decline by Jan Czarzasty and Adam Mrozowicki in Trade Unions in the European Union, edited by Jeremy Waddington, Torsten Müller and Kurt Vandaele, Peter Lang, 2023 https://www.etui.org/sites/default/files/2023-06/Chapter22_Poland_Trade%20unions%20developing%20after%20a%20decline_2023.pdf 

• 2

  Partnerzy dialogu społecznego - związki zawodowe i organizacje pracodawców, GUS, 27.08.2019 https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/gospodarka-spoleczna-wolontariat/gospodarka-spoleczna-trzeci-sektor/partnerzy-dialogu-spolecznego-zwiazki-zawodowe-i-organizacje-pracodawcow-wyniki-wstepne,16,1.html and Partnerzy dialogu społecznego – organizacje pracodawców i związki zawodowe w 2022, GUS 04.09.2023 https://stat.gov.pl/download/gfx/portalinformacyjny/pl/defaultaktualnosci/5490/16/2/1/partnerzy_dialogu_spolecznego_-_organizacje_pracodawcow_i_zwiazki_zawodowe_w_2022_r..pdf 

• 3

  OECD (2024), "Trade Unions: Trade union density", OECD Employment and Labour Market Statistics (database), https://doi.org/10.1787/data-00371-en

• 4

  Table 2.1 Aktywność ekonomiczna ludności Polski III kwartał 2022 roku, GUS 31.01.2023 https://stat.gov.pl/download/gfx/portalinformacyjny/pl/defaultaktualnosci/5475/4/48/1/aktywnosc_ekonomiczna_ludnosci_polski_3_kwartal_2022_r-tablice_2.zip 

• 5

  Związki zawodowe w Polsce, Nr 140/2021, Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej (CBOS), November 2021 https://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2021/K_140_21.PDF 

• 6

  On the history of Polish trade unions, see Trade unions in Poland, by J. Gardawski, A. Mrozowicki, J. Czarzasty, Report 123 ETUI, Brussels 2012, p. 31-33.

• 7

   ETUC Annual Gender Equality Survey 2019 – 12th edition, by Lionel Fulton and Cinzia Sechi, ETUC, April 2019  https://www.etuc.org/sites/default/files/circular/file/2019-05/ETUC_Annual_Equality_Survey%202019_FINAL_EN.pdf (Accessed 03.04.2020) 

• 8

   Representativeness of the social partners in European cross-industry social dialogue, Eurofound 2023 https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2023-11/ef22020en-.pdf 

• 9

  Jest nas już https://www.opzz.org.pl/ 

• 10

   Ogólnokrajowe organizacje członkowskie, OPZZ website https://www.opzz.org.pl/opzz/struktura/ogolnokrajowe-organizacje-czlonkowskie

• 11

   O ZNP, ZNP Website https://znp.edu.pl/o_nas/o-znp/

• 12

   O Nas Organizacje członkowskie  FZZ website http://fzz.org.pl/o-nas/

• 13

   OZZPIP website http://ozzpip.pl/o-nas/

• 14

   See NSZZ Solidarność website http://www.solidarnosc.org.pl/sekretariaty-branzowe

• 15

  See Poland: Trade unions developing after a decline by Jan Czarzasty and Adam Mrozowicki in Trade Unions in the European Union, edited by Jeremy Waddington, Torsten Müller and Kurt Vandaele, Peter Lang, 2023

• 16

   Nawrocki z poparciem związkowców. Co na to wyborcy? Gazeta Prawna, 17.02.2025 https://www.gazetaprawna.pl/wiadomosci/kraj/artykuly/9740664,nawrocki-z-poparciem-zwiazkowcow-co-na-to-wyborcy.html 

• 17

   Lewica i OPZZ ustaliły plan współpracy, pulshr.pl 03.02.2022 https://www.pulshr.pl/zwiazki-zawodowe/lewica-i-opzz-ustalily-plan-wspolpracy,87643.html?mp=promo

• 18

  For a detailed examination of the role of unions in Poland, see Coming full circle? Contestation, social dialogue and trade union politics in Poland by Magdalena Bernaciak, in Rough waters: European trade unions in a time of crises, edited by Steffen Lehndorff, Heiner Dribbusch and Thorsten Schulten, ETUI, 2018

• 19

  The Constitution of the Republic of Poland, 2 April 1997 https://www.sejm.gov.pl/prawo/konst/angielski/kon1.htm

• 20

  Ustawa z dnia 23 maja 1991 r. o związkach zawodowych, https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU19910550234

• 21

  See Związki zawodowe, PIP website https://www.pip.gov.pl/o-nas/wspolpraca/zwiazki-zawodowe

• 22

  Członkostwo w związkach zawodowych. Naruszenia praw pracowniczych i „szara strefa” w zatrudnieniu, Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej, 2009; Związki zawodowe i naruszenia praw pracowniczych, Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej (CBOS), 2010; Związki zawodowe w Polsce, Nr 138/2019, Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej (CBOS), 2019 and Związki zawodowe w Polsce, Nr 140/2021, Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej (CBOS), November 2021

• 23

   Rozwój Związku, NSZZ Solidarność website  http://www.solidarnosc.org.pl/aktualnosci/wiadomosci/rozwoj

• 24

  Dlaczego warto być w związku, OPZZ website  www.opzz.org.pl/jak-zalozyc-zwiazek-zawodowy-i-przystapic-do-opzz

• 25

  Partnerzy dialogu społecznego – organizacje pracodawców i związki zawodowe w 2022, GUS 04.09.2023

• 26

   ibid

• 27

  ETUC Annual Gender Equality Survey 2019 – 12th edition, by Lionel Fulton and Cinzia Sechi, ETUC, April 2019  https://www.etuc.org/sites/default/files/circular/file/2019-05/ETUC_Annual_Equality_Survey%202019_FINAL_EN.pdf 

• 28

   For a detailed analysis of collective bargaining in Poland see Collective bargaining in Poland: a near-death experience by Jan Czarzasty in Collective bargaining in Europe: towards an endgame, edited by Torsten Müller, Kurt Vandaele and Jeremy Waddington, ETUI, 2019 https://www.etui.org/sites/default/files/CB%20Vol%20II%20Chapter%2022.pdf

• 29

  On the relation between the collective agreements concluded on different levels see ‚Legal framework for collective labour agreements and other collective agreements in Poland“, by D. Skupień, in Überbetriebliche versus innerbetriebliche Kollektivvereinbarungen, 5. Arbeitsrechtlicher Dialog, Nomos, Baden-Baden 2012, s. 69.

• 30

   OECD/AIAS ICTWSS database https://data-explorer.oecd.org/vis?lc=en&df[ds]=dsDisseminateFinalDMZ&df[id]=DSD_TUD_CBC%40DF_CBC&df[ag]=OECD.ELS.SAE&dq=..&pd=2000%2C&to[TIME_PERIOD]=false&vw=tb

• 31

  Układy zbiorowe pracy Ministerstwo Rodziny, Pracy i Polityki Społecznej, Gdzie są rejestrowane układy zbiorowe pracy?https://www.gov.pl/web/dialog/uklady-zbiorowe-pracy

• 32

   Raport z Konsultacji z Partnerami Społecznymi na temat potencjału układów zbiorowych, by Błażej Mądrzycki and Łukasz Pisarczyk, https://www.gov.pl/attachment/40d24645-e102-4065-93ed-180523a085c2

• 33

   Gazeta prawna 29 December 2022, interview with Łukasz Pisarczyk https://www.gazetaprawna.pl/praca/artykuly/8620129,lukasz-pisarczyk-uklady-zbiorowe-rds-mechanizmy-dialog.html quoted in Poland: developments in working life 2023, Eurofound https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2024-07/wpef24056.pdf 

• 34

   Sprawozdanie Głównego Inspektora Pracy z działalności Państwowej Inspekcji Pracy w 2024 roku, Tab. 15.20 and 15.21 https://orka.sejm.gov.pl/Druki10ka.nsf/0/C23DC21217C675C3C1258CC10034EBBE/%24File/1463.pdf 

• 35

   Układy zbiorowe pracy szansą na rozwój dialogu społecznego?, 8 November 2024, PIP website https://www.pip.gov.pl/aktualnosci/uklady-zbiorowe-pracy-szansa-na-rozwoj-dialogu-spolecznego

• 36

   Table 2.1 Aktywność ekonomiczna ludności Polski III kwartał 2024 roku, GUS 30.01.2025 https://stat.gov.pl/download/gfx/portalinformacyjny/pl/defaultaktualnosci/5475/4/56/1/aktywnosc_ekonomiczna_polski_za_3_kw_2024_tablice.zip

• 37

   Projekt ustawy o układach zbiorowych pracy i porozumieniach zbiorowych, Kancelaria Prezesa Rady Ministrów, June 2024 https://www.gov.pl/web/premier/projekt-ustawy-o-ukladach-zbiorowych-pracy-i-porozumieniach-zbiorowych 

• 38

   For a detailed examination of the role of unions in Poland, see Coming full circle? Contestation, social dialogue and trade union politics in Poland by Magdalena Bernaciak, in Rough waters: European trade unions in a time of crises, edited by Steffen Lehndorff, Heiner Dribbusch and Thorsten Schulten, ETUI, 2018

• 39

  Sprawozdanie Głównego Inspektora Pracy z działalności Państwowej Inspekcji Pracy w 2024 roku, Tab. 15.20

• 40

  Nawrocki z poparciem związkowców. Co na to wyborcy? Gazeta Prawna, 17.02.2025 https://www.gazetaprawna.pl/wiadomosci/kraj/artykuly/9740664,nawrocki-z-poparciem-zwiazkowcow-co-na-to-wyborcy.html

• 41

  For a detailed analysis of collective bargaining in Poland see Collective bargaining in Poland: a near-death experience by Jan Czarzasty in Collective bargaining in Europe: towards an endgame, edited by Torsten Müller, Kurt Vandaele and Jeremy Waddington, ETUI, 2019

• 42

  Ustawa z dnia 23 maja 1991 r. o związkach zawodowych

• 43

  The Constitution of the Republic of Poland, 2 April 1997 https://www.sejm.gov.pl/prawo/konst/angielski/kon1.htm 

• 44

  Ustawa o rozwiązywaniu sporów zbiorowych, 1991

• 45

  Protesty i strajki 2024 r, Dialog społeczny / Ministerstwo Rodziny, Pracy i Polityki Społecznej  https://www.gov.pl/attachment/71230e7b-a9db-44eb-bb3d-ac7a09c3a17a

• 46

  Związki zawodowe w Polsce, Nr 140/2021, Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej (CBOS), November 2021 https://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2021/K_140_21.PDF

• 47

  Projekt ustawy o układach zbiorowych pracy i porozumieniach zbiorowych, Kancelaria Prezesa Rady Ministrów, June 2024 https://www.gov.pl/web/premier/projekt-ustawy-o-ukladach-zbiorowych-pracy-i-porozumieniach-zbiorowych

• 48

  Sprawozdanie Głównego Inspektora Pracy z działalności Państwowej Inspekcji Pracy w 2014 roku, p. 28 https://www.pip.gov.pl/files/134/Archiwum/424/Sprawozdanie-PIP-2014.pdf

• 49

  Układy zbiorowe pracy szansą na rozwój dialogu społecznego?, 8 November 2024, PIP website https://www.pip.gov.pl/aktualnosci/uklady-zbiorowe-pracy-szansa-na-rozwoj-dialogu-spolecznego

• 50

  Ustawa z dnia 10 października 2002 r. o minimalnym wynagrodzeniu za pracę

• 51

  Rada Dialogu Społecznego, https://www.gov.pl/web/dialog/rada-dialogu-spolecznego3

• 52

  Wzrost wynagrodzeń w budżetówce. Coś się zmienia po 10 latach, ale to nie jest dobra wiadomość, INFOR, 18.07.2025 https://www.infor.pl/prawo/zarobki/wysokosc-zarobkow/7000155,wzrost-wynagrodzen-w-budzetowce-cos-sie-zmienia-po-10-latach-ale-to-nie-jest-dobra-wiadomosc.html 

• 53

  Ustawa o związkach zawodowych, 1991 https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU19910550234

• 54

  Ustawa o informowaniu pracowników i przeprowadzaniu z nimi konsultacji 2006

• 55

  Ustawa o szczególnych zasadach rozwiązywania z pracownikami stosunków pracy z przyczyn niedotyczących pracowników, 2003

• 56

  Ustawa o samorządzie załogi przedsiębiorstwa państwowego, 1981

• 57

  For further details on workplace representation see i.a. The influence of EU Law on Employees’ Involvement in Poland by Skupien D., in R. Blanpain, M. Tiraboschi (eds) The Global Labour Market: From Globalization to Flexicurity, Bulletin of Comparative Labour Relations 65/08. L. Mitrus, Works Councils in Poland: Problems of Informing and Consulting Employees in: Workers’ Representation in Central and Eastern Europe. Challenges and Opportunities for the Works Councils System, ed. R. Blanpain, N. Lyutow, Alphen aan den Rijn 2014.

• 58

  Partnerzy dialogu społecznego – organizacje pracodawców i związki zawodowe w 2022, GUS 04.09.2023 https://stat.gov.pl/download/gfx/portalinformacyjny/pl/defaultaktualnosci/5490/16/2/1/partnerzy_dialogu_spolecznego_-_organizacje_pracodawcow_i_zwiazki_zawodowe_w_2022_r..pdf

• 59

  Związki zawodowe w Polsce, Nr 140/2021, Centrum Badania Opinii Społecznej (CBOS), November 2021 https://www.cbos.pl/SPISKOM.POL/2021/K_140_21.PDF

• 60

  The failure of a new form of employee representation: Polish works councils in comparative perspective by Katarzyna Skorupińska, in European Journal of Industrial Relations, 2018, Vol. 24(2) 163– 178

• 61

  Rady pracowników w Polsce znikają. Może je uratować szybka nowelizacja ustawy, by Mariusz Ławnik, Instytut Spraw Obywatelskich,18.12.2024 https://instytutsprawobywatelskich.pl/rady-pracownikow-w-polsce-znikaja-moze-je-uratowac-szybka-nowelizacja-ustawy/

• 62

  Company numbers for 2023 from Eurostat: Annual enterprise statistics by size class. There were 15,713 companies with between 50 and 249 employees in 2023 and 3,555 with 250 or more. 

• 63

  European Company Survey 2019 - Workplace practices unlocking employee potential, by Gijs van Houten and Giovanni Russo, Eurofound 2020, Figures for Table 72 https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/system/files/2020-11/ef20001en.pdf

• 64

  The failure of a new form of employee representation: Polish works councils in comparative perspective by Katarzyna Skorupińska, in European Journal of Industrial Relations, 2018, Vol. 24(2) 163– 178

• 65

  Rady pracowników w Polsce znikają. Może je uratować szybka nowelizacja ustawy, by Mariusz Ławnik, Instytut Spraw Obywatelskich,18.12.2024

• 66

  Dane dotyczace rad pracownikow https://www.gov.pl/attachment/0ca32c5e-9f7a-42aa-9950-6b56c26a0db5

• 67

  The failure of a new form of employee representation: Polish works councils in comparative perspective by Katarzyna Skorupińska, in European Journal of Industrial Relations, 2018, Vol. 24(2) 163– 178

• 68

  Jednolity tekst statutu NSZZ „Solidarność”, po wprowadzeniu zmian uchwalonych przez XXX Krajowy Zjazd Delegatów NSZZ "Solidarność" w dniu 27 Maja 2022 roku https://www.solidarnosc.org.pl/dokumenty/statutowo-wyborcze/statut-nszz-solidarnosc/ and Statut Związku Nauczycielstwa Polskiego, https://znp.edu.pl/assets/uploads/2020/02/Statut-ZNP-tekst-jednolity-z-23.11.2019.pdf 

• 69

  Zakładowa organizacja związkowa, https://www.gov.pl/web/dialog/zwiazki-zawodowe

• 70

  Art. 30.6 Ustawa o związkach zawodowych 1991

• 71

  The failure of a new form of employee representation: Polish works councils in comparative perspective by Katarzyna Skorupińska, in European Journal of Industrial Relations, 2018

• 72

  For more details see D. Skupien, ‘Board-level employee participation in Polish limited-liability companies’, in Arbeitnehmerbteiligung in Unternehmensorganen im internationalen Vegleich, ed. G. Loeschnigg, Wien 2011

• 73

  https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU19910550234/U/D19910234Lj.pdf 

• 74

  https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU19740240141/U/D19740141Lj.pdf 

• 75

  See Protection of trade unionists – when does it not apply? (Ochrona związkowców – kiedy się jej nie stosuje?) by Emilia Lazarowicz 10 June 2021 https://poradnikprzedsiebiorcy.pl/-ochrona-zwiazkowcow-kiedy-sie-jej-nie-stosuje

• 76

  Ustawa o informowaniu pracowników i przeprowadzaniu z nimi konsultacji  https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20060790550/U/D20060550Lj.pdf 

• 77

  Ustawa o europejskich radach zakładowych 2002 https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20020620556/U/D20020556Lj.pdf 

• 78

  For a detailed examination of board-level employee representation in Poland see Trade union dilemmas about the deeper sense of employeeparticipation by Andrzej Zybala in Lafuente S. (ed.) (Forthcoming) Revisiting worker representation on boards: the forgotten EU countries in codetermination studies, ETUI

• 79

  Ustawa o komercjalizacji i niektórych uprawnieniach pracowników 1996 https://arslege.pl/ustawa-o-komercjalizacji-i-niektorych-uprawnieniach-pracownikow-poprzedni-tytul-ustawa-o-komercjalizacji-i-prywatyzacji-przedsiebiorstw-panstwowych/k62/s1159/

• 80

  Spółki z udziałem Skarbu Państwa Działaniai wyniki 2016-2023. MAP November 2023   https://www.gov.pl/attachment/de7ec011-dc1a-44c2-bc4d-368d8d24ede1 

• 81

  Orlen Fact Books, 2023 https://www.orlen.pl/content/dam/internet/orlen/pl/en/investor-relations/presentations/fact-book/documents/ORLEN_Factbook_2023.xlsx.coredownload.xlsx 

• 82

  Raport Zintegrowany 2023, PGE https://raportzintegrowany2023.gkpge.pl/o-raporcie/istotne-wskazniki/wskazniki-w-obszarze-kwestii-pracowniczych/ 

• 83

  Akcjonariusze PKP Cargo wprowadzili zmiany w statucie spółki, 7 October 2024, Kolejowyportal.pl https://kolejowyportal.pl/akcjonariusze-pkp-cargo-wprowadzili-zmiany-w-statucie-spolki/#google_vignette

• 84

  Powołanie Członków Rady Nadzorczej spółki Grupa Azoty S.A. na XII kadencję, 27.o6.2024, Grupa Azoty https://grupaazoty.com/aktualnosci/powolanie-czlonkow-rady-nadzorczej-spolki-grupa-azoty-s-a-na-xii-kadencje 

• 85

  Rada Nadzorcza, Poczta Polska https://www.poczta-polska.pl/grupa-pp/poczta-polska/wladze-spolki/rada-nadzorcza/

• 86

  Art. 386 Kodeks spółek handlowych

• 87

  Ustawa o europejskich radach zakładowych 2002  https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20020620556/U/D20020556Lj.pdf

• 88

  For further details see European Works Councils. Poland, by Dagmara Skupien, in International Encyclopaedia of Laws, Suppl. 319/2007 R. Blanpain (ed.)

• 89

  Ustawa o europejskim zgrupowaniu interesów gospodarczych i spółce europejskiej 2005 https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/download.xsp/WDU20050620551/U/D20050551Lj.pdf

• 90

  Poradnik społecznego inspektora pracy, by Tomasz Rutkowski, Państwowa Inspekcja Pracy, 2005 https://soljg.eu/lib/ks5cs1/poradniksip-k5gvvqwm.pdf

• 91

  Third European Survey of Enterprises on New and Emerging Risks (ESENER 2019): Overview Report How European workplaces manage safety and health, European Agency for Safety and Health at Work https://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/esener-2019-overview-report-how-european-workplaces-manage-safety-and-health

• 92

  For more information on the national context see  OSH system at national level – Poland, OSH Wiki by Malgorzata Pecillo  https://oshwiki.eu/wiki/OSH_system_at_national_level_-_Poland